Magnetoception
From
Wikipedia, the free
encyclopedia
Magnetoception
(or "magnetoreception") is
the ability to detect changes in a magnetic
field to perceive
direction or altitude and has even been postulated as a
method for animals to develop regional maps. It is most
commonly observed in birds,
though it has also been observed in many other
animals
including honeybees and
turtles. Researchers have identified a probable sensor
in pigeons:
a small (dwarf), heavily innervated region of the skull,
which contains biological magnetite.
Humans have a similar magnetite deposit in the
ethmoid
bone of the
nose,
and there is some evidence this gives humans some
magnetoception.
[1][2]
Although there is no dispute that a magnetic sense exists
in many avians (it is essential to the navigational
abilities of migratory
birds), it is a controversial
and not well-understood phenomenon. Certain types of
bacteria (magnetotactic
bacteria)
and fungi
[3]are
also known to sense the flux direction, these
contain organelles
known as magnetosomes
for this purpose. In
bees,
it has been observed that magnetite is embedded across
the cellular
membrane of a
small group of neurons;
the theory is that when the magnetite aligns with the
Earth's magnetic field, induction
causes a current to cross the
membrane which depolarizes the cell.
References
[edit]
External links
Do humans have a compass in their nose?
By Dr Stephen Juan
Published Friday 17th November 2006 11:22 GMT
The Register
Who knows what there is to know about the nose?
(http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/11/17/the_odd_body_nose/)
Do humans have a compass in their nose?
Asked by Lee Staniforth of Manchester, UK
Some years ago scientists at CALTECH (California Institute
of Technology in Pasadena) discovered that humans possess a
tiny, shiny crystal of magnetite in the ethmoid bone,
located between your eyes, just behind the nose.
Magnetite is a magnetic mineral also possessed by homing
pigeons, migratory salmon, dolphins, honeybees, and bats.
Indeed, some bacteria even contain strands of magnetite
that function, according to Dr Charles Walcott of the
Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology in Ithaca, New York, "as
tiny compass needles, allowing them [the bacteria] to
orient themselves in the earth's magnetic field and swim
down to their happy home in the mud".
It seems that magnetite helps direction finding in animals
and helps migratory species migrate successfully by
allowing them to draw upon the earth's magnetic fields. But
scientists are not sure how they do this.
In any case, when it comes to humans, according to some
experts, magnetite makes the ethmoid bone sensitive to the
earth's magnetic field and helps your sense of direction.
Some, such as Dr Dennis J Walmsley and W Epps from the
Department of Human Geography of the Australian National
University in Canberra writing in Perceptual and Motor
Skills as far back as in 1987, have even suggested that
this "compass" was helpful in human evolution as it made
migration and hunting easier.
Following this fascinating factoid, science journalist Marc
McCutcheon entitled a book The Compass in Your Nose and
Other Astonishing Facts.
Stephen Juan, Ph.D. is an anthropologist at the University
of Sydney. Email your Odd Body questions to
s.juan@edfac.usyd.edu.au
(mailto:s.juan@edfac.usyd.edu.au)
Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6, 703-712 (2005);
doi:10.1038/nrn1745
THE PHYSICS AND NEUROBIOLOGY OF MAGNETORECEPTION
Sönke Johnsen & Kenneth J. Lohmann about the authors
From
Nature.com
Abstract
Diverse animals can detect magnetic fields but little is
known about how they do so. Three main hypotheses of
magnetic field perception have been proposed.
Electrosensitive marine fish might detect the Earth's field
through electromagnetic induction, but direct evidence that
induction underlies magnetoreception in such fish has not
been obtained. Studies in other animals have provided
evidence that is consistent with two other mechanisms:
biogenic magnetite and chemical reactions that are
modulated by weak magnetic fields. Despite recent advances,
however, magnetoreceptors have not been identified with
certainty in any animal, and the mode of transduction for
the magnetic sense remains unknown.
Summary
Behavioural experiments have shown that diverse animals can
detect the Earth's magnetic field and use it as a cue for
guiding movements over both long and short distances.
However, whereas receptors for most other sensory systems
have been characterized and studied, primary receptors
involved in detecting magnetic fields have not yet been
identified with certainty. This article reviews the three
main mechanisms that have been proposed to underlie
magnetoreception (electromagnetic induction, chemical
magnetoreception and biogenic magnetite) and evaluates the
evidence for each.
Electromagnetic induction involves detecting small
electrical currents that are generated when an animal moves
through the Earth's magnetic field. This requires a
well-developed electrosense. Most induction models also
require the animal to live in a conductive medium such as
sea water. Although sharks and a few other electrosensitive
marine fishes might plausibly rely on induction, no direct
evidence has yet been obtained that they do so.
Chemical magnetoreception involves molecular reactions, the
yields of which are modified by the direction and intensity
of Earth-strength magnetic fields. All proposed reactions
involve electron spins in pairs of radicals. At present,
however, no radical pair reaction has been identified that
is affected by magnetic fields as weak as the Earth's.
Evidence consistent with a radical pair mechanism includes
effects of light and radio-frequency fields on magnetic
orientation behaviour.
The magnetite hypothesis posits that crystals of the
magnetic mineral magnetite transduce magnetic field energy
into physical forces that can be detected by the nervous
system. In several animals, magnetite has been detected in
anatomical locations that have been linked to
magnetoreception, but unequivocal morphological or
neurophysiological evidence for magnetite-based receptors
has not yet been obtained.
All three of the proposed mechanisms are plausible from the
standpoint of physics and, at present, the available data
are insufficient to confirm or refute any of them.
Different animals might rely on different mechanisms.
Moreover, at least a few animals might use two different
magnetoreception systems, one for sensing field direction
and the other for sensing field elements useful for
determining geographic position. Each system might be based
on separate receptors with different underlying mechanisms.
Most magnetoreception research has been based on
behavioural studies. Sustained efforts are now needed to
exploit a wider range of modern neuroscience techniques.
Such undertakings might be facilitated by the discovery
that magnetic sensitivity exists in several favorable model
systems, including zebrafish, the fruitfly Drosophila
melanogaster and the mollusc Tritonia diomedea.
Author biographies
Sönke
Johnsen is currently an assistant professor in the
Department of Biology at Duke University, Durham, North
Carolina, USA. He received his Ph.D. in 1996 from the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA, where he
worked with William Kier on the optical design of
decentralized visual systems in echinoderms. He then
received postdoctoral fellowships from Woods Hole
Oceanographic Institution, Massachusetts, USA, and Harbor
Branch Oceanographic Institution, Florida, USA, where he
studied the optical and sensory properties of oceanic
species. His current interests include the interactions of
light and magnetic fields with organic and non-organic
materials, with an emphasis on their implications for
sensory biology and ecology.
Kenneth Lohmann is a professor of biology at the University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA. He received his
Ph.D. from the University of Washington, Seattle, USA, and
completed postdoctoral studies at the University of
Illinois, USA, and the Marine Biological Laboratory in
Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA. He is trained as both a
neuroscientist and a marine biologist, and has broad
interests in neuroethology, sensory biology and animal
behaviour. He is particularly interested in how sea turtles
and other marine animals navigate long distances through
the ocean, and how animals detect and exploit the Earth's
magnetic field.
Cattle shown to align north-south
By Elizabeth Mitchell
Science reporter, BBC News
Link to BBC News
Have you ever noticed that herds of grazing animals all
face the same way? Images from Google Earth have confirmed
that cattle tend to align their bodies in a north-south
direction. Wild deer also display this behaviour - a
phenomenon that has apparently gone unnoticed by herdsmen
and hunters for thousands of years.
In the Proceedings for the National Academy of Sciences,
scientists say the Earth's magnetic fields may influence
the behaviour of these animals. The Earth can be viewed as
a huge magnet, with magnetic north and south situated close
to the geographical poles. Many species - including birds
and salmon - are known to use the Earth's magnetic fields
in migration, rather like a natural GPS.
A few studies have shown that some mammals - including bats
- also use a "magnetic compass" to help their sense of
direction. Dr Sabine Begall, from the University of
Duisburg-Essen, Germany, has mainly studied the magnetic
sense of mole rats - African animals that live in
underground tunnels. "We were wondering if larger animals
also have this magnetic sense," she told BBC News.
Dr Begall and colleagues first decided to study the natural
behaviour of domestic cattle. The researchers surveyed
Google Earth images of 8,510 grazing and resting cattle in
308 pasture plains across the globe. "Sometimes it took
hours and hours to find some pictures with good
resolution," said Dr Begall. The scientists were unable to
distinguish between the head and rear of the cattle, but
could tell that the animals tended to face either north or
south.
Their study ruled out the possibility that the Sun position
or wind direction were major influences on the orientation
of the cattle. Dr Begall said: "In Africa and South
America, the cattle (were) shifted slightly to a more
north-eastern-south-western direction. "But it is known
that the Earth's magnetic field is much weaker there," she
explained.
The researchers also recorded the body positions of 2,974
wild deer in 277 locations across the Czech Republic. Their
fieldwork revealed that the majority of grazing and resting
deer face northward. About one-third of the deer faced
southward. "That might be some kind of anti-predatory
behaviour," speculated Dr Begall.
Willy Miller - a Scottish cattle farmer - remarked: "I've
never noticed that my cows all face the same way." Cows are
social animals: "[They] all sit down before it rains [and]
huddle together in a circle formation during blizzards. But
from a cow's point of view, that's just sensible," he told
BBC News.
Professor John Phillips, a sensory biologist from Virginia
Tech University, US, commented that this sixth magnetic
sense might be "virtually ubiquitous in the animal
kingdom". He added: "We need to think about some really
fundamental things that this sensory ability provides in
animals." The challenge remains for scientists to explain
how the animals behave in this way - and if Scottish cattle
are the exception to the rule!
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/science/nature/7575459.stm
Published: 2008/08/25 21:04:01 GMT
© BBC MMVIII